More detail

I've noticed that the ostensibly Jesuit media have been making quite an effort to imply to Me that the recent 'news' regarding London was actually spurious, and that as such there was no loss of literal life there, and thus the PR effect was negligible.  If it was anything like the scenarios in the overt States it was presumably a legitimate practice effort for something else, which the media then featured as though it were actually a manifested spontaneous event.

I'm not certain I understand how much better it is for PR to have an international pseudo-organization presenting a part of itself as a service which legitimately informs the public about current events, and yet systematically defrauds the public for the perceived geopolitical advantage of its pseudo-organization.  Nor how organizing covertly to manifest 'suckage' overtly does so.  I get that they're using counter-Divine Will imagery and symbolism as a sort of disclaimer to essentially disavow the accuracy of their content, but this sort of a disclaimer isn't something that everyone in the public is aware of.  So innocents, or at least what passes for innocents in modern society, would appear to be manifestly detrimented and manipulated by these pseudo-organizations systematically and routinely for the perceived benefit of these pseudo-organizations.  A quick perusal of social media would appear to confirm the widespread results of this.

As someone Choosing to retain an alignment with Divine Will, that disclaimer doesn't always come across effectively even with familiarity with the symbolism.  There's sometimes a legitimate need, usually prompted by duty, to address spontaneous manifest scenarios that contain within them some inherent counter-Divine Will symbolism that nobody intends or at least that I certainly don't.  And it doesn't seem much of a distinguishing characteristic to have counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery used to negate credibility by pseudo-organizations which are themselves behaving on a counter-Divine Will basis, and even doing so routinely and systematically.

We'd encountered the same kind of phenomenon at My "house"; although we use "absurdity" to demonstrate that something is clearly risible and dysfunctional, that meaning is lost when the speaker is themselves acting upon a basis of "absurdity", of Willful disharmony and misalignment with Divine Will principles.  That is, it's not communicated effectively that something is senseless, dysfunctional and silly when the basis of the person speaking is founded on similar Choices.  So here, when a pseudo-organization uses counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery to indicate negation or invalidation, and yet it also exists on the basis of a counter-Divine Will position and even regularly benefits from so doing, the implications for the nature and status of that pseudo-organization, and for any arrangements made by others with it, to be just as void, negated, invalid become rather self-evident.

The inherent notion of an absolute dualism, that is, 'Divine Will and [something else which is precluded by Divine Will]', is fundamentally erroneous.  So when you have anything, such as a pseudo-organization or an arrangement, that's founded upon what in an Absolute sense is nothing, despite perhaps having something manifestly there it's still... bogus.  Void.  Negated.  Invalidated quite inherently by Divine Will.  Attempts to apply a system of fairness to enforce such arrangements or to legitimatize such pseudo-organizations would require either misusing a working system, or exploiting a dysfunctional one.  Either way, it's not a righteous approach and would result in PR resultants.  Even if it didn't, it would still manifest inherent kharmic resultants.  It's the inevitable result of investing Will into something that's predicated on a counter-Divine Will basis.

It's been implied that the 'core group' within 'the other guys' intends to show up later, once the public has been thoroughly subverted, and lay claim to everything on a Divine Will basis.  It's not apparent how they intend to do this, because at that juncture they would have presumably have a position that was established through plenty of benefit from efforts by pseudo-organizations on a counter-Divine Will basis.  I understand that they consist of people used to doing all manner of similar restructuring in the corporate realm using 'shell corporations' and the like, but it's not feasible to exploit the metaphysical flaws in Divine Will principles because they're not only absolutes, they are quite perfect.  Manifestly, overt tax dodges exist.  Kharmic dodges do not.

Freedom involves receiving the manifest resultants of your own Choices, and some of those manifest resultants come in the form of kharmic accountability.  If they didn't, the system of receiving the manifestations of your own acts of Will would not be perfect.  To avoid that kind of accountability would mean that you'd be making Choices, and not encountering their manifestations.  Self-evidently, to desire that would be to desire an impotent Will.  It's not easy to consider, for example, Babylonian Gnostic occultists desiring that.  That would be the position of a literal 'minor' who is in need of someone to take custody of their Choices to provide stewardship for them.  Interestingly, that formula already appears to be understood by them; they've been employing it with the People with regard to their relationship with the overt state for quite some while now.  So-called 'corporate limited liability' for example, or 'the Nanny State', the idea that the state alone should take responsibility - and control - for so many aspects of their own lives.  So it's counter intuitive to fathom Babylonian Gnostics for example who put so much emphasis on manifesting the results of their own acts of Will, yet also seem reluctant to encounter some of those manifestations.

Divine Will principles are there to keep those acts of Will quite worthy, so that their manifestations can also be worthy, desirable and more than satisfactory.  To understand, indeed to accept!, that is to appreciate Divine Will and accept its basis into your lives.

Valuation

I prefer not to get unnecessarily political here but there are times when it's directly relevant to Divine Will principles and clarification helps. The geopolitical situation demonstrates that 'the other guys' are continuing their globalization agenda while still behaving in direct conflict with Divine Will. North Korea and Myanmar have been the items 'the other guys' media have been going on about recently, and it would appear that both have been designed with the long-term objective of getting the People to accept a supposed need of a U.N. with increased clout. 'If only the U.N. had more clout,' the reasoning is supposed to go, 'we wouldn't have countries putting at risk the safety of the rest of the other countries in the case of North Korea, and there would be so much humanitarian good for refugees.' Continue reading "Valuation"

Reiteration

I've already presented My position on it, but a courtesy reiteration seems appropriate to the covert implied content presented in this.

The gist is that it appears to be an indication of a synchronized organizational effort by 'the other guys' to seek to gain My acceptance of a supposedly benevolent position that's nevertheless undermined by a basis of counter-Divine Will imagery, symbolism, positionality, and that of grotesquery and 'suckage'.  Again, such a position is "absurd" inherently due to its counter-Divine Will basis and must be rejected.

This pattern is inherent throughout the episode in many places, especially in the imagery and symbolism with "fish" and the symbolism present in Texas governor Abbott's statement, presented twenty-six minutes, forty seconds into the program.

It's self-evidently nonsensical to suggest that anyone is 'saving' anyone from a counter-Divine Will basis.

It's curious to find that 'the other guys' have been making an effort to present such an effort, and to modulate it via symbolism formats intended to be readily comprehensible to Me.  Particularly as I have already detailed the fallacy of such an effort here on numerous occasions.  I suppose for those manifestly Choosing to invest in a counter-Divine Will basis they're already Choosing to waste their own literal and symbolic "time" [My context], and the various specific forms and permutations of that Choice are then purely incidental.

The maxim of law is that 'Justice delayed is justice denied', and the same applies to Divine Love and the Choice to align with Divine Will which begets that.  Thus for whatever this effort purports or implies itself as, such a Choice is only an investment in manifesting more "time" and dysfunctionality.  That basic Choice of course is also the Choice to manifest its own like resultants for the Choosers.  We can of course all do so much better than that, and make Choices which are actually worthy of ourselves and our Creator.

All this of course is 'layered over' more overt aspects of 'the other guys' less than worthy and more overt efforts, such as perpetuating the 'anti-Trump' 'deep state' hype as part of an ongoing fraud against the People by inculcating the notion of two 'factions' amongst 'the other guys'.  And efforts by a Harvard law professor who as I understand it never actually studied 'the Constitution' to both make determinations about it which were intended to bolster the public fraud I've just described, and to legitimatize another of 'the other guys'' ongoing public frauds by misrepresenting the prevalent overt U.S. court system as legitimate courts of law.  They manifestly do not meet the requirements to be courts of law, and are in fact nisi prius courts.

Their other less than worthy agendas they also continue to invest in.  Their mid- to longer-term plans for a multiple public fraud enacted through Vladimir Putin - with much organizational support - has not escaped My notice and are of course quite objectionable.

I should perhaps make it plain that when I object to something and particularly here, although this seems to be misinterpreted as some kind of a 'haggling' or negotiation effort as a prerequisite to gaining My acceptance of 'the other guys'' manifestly counter-Divine Will positions, what I in fact mean is that they're objectionable as yet another instance of said counter-Divine Will positions, usually with rights violations inherent there.  I am simply making plain a few of the specific items which it's My duty, per Divine Will alignment, to reject.  For 'the other guys' to have been manifestly investing in such efforts is unthinkable to Me, just part and parcel of their manifest Choice for a counter-Divine Will position.

Manifestly, it's "absurdity" on "absurdity" - which invariably is what happens when anyone Chooses a counter-Divine Will position and leaves it uncorrected.  Just as with 'the other guys'' various fronts and franchise organizations, a single principal counter-Divine Will basis is the foundation for the various permutations, forms and agendas they've manifestly been presenting.  As the foundational position is literally, per Divine Will, unacceptable so of course are the various resultants and permutations of that Choice.

You know.  The manifest Choice for a counter-Divine Will basis that was always unworthy, undesirable, and makes no sense to invest in in the first place.

Constancy

Have not had either literal or symbolic "time" [My "house"'s context] recently to publish these responses and clarifications, as I'm living on a literal farm with adorable critters and quality relationships. It's encouraging and refreshing to find that the results of good Choices will out, per Divine Will, with or without the active support of an international confluence of telepaths and propheciers functioning properly in a good, healthy, righteous and sincere manner. In My off moments I have a Wiki to put together to expose the various manifest layers of symbolism being Continue reading "Constancy"