It's quite simple.  As any Babylonian Gnostic already knows, investing Will into a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis is a Work to manifest exactly that basis.

Covertly implying any number of things on that basis still manifestly continues to be an investment of Will counter to My Will, counter to Divine Will, counter to their own True Nature, and is the Choice to continue investing into something with undesirable kharmic and PR repercussions.

It doesn't matter what specifically is implied on that basis, even by using counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery to 'void it out'.  Where you put your Will, there's your investment.  [disrespect + counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery] is not equal to [respect], it's a sort of double-negative and quite unsatisfactory.  It's certainly an ongoing rejection of their True Nature.

I've tried to be assistive, clarifying on the off chance that something needed better understanding.  I've done so, and now when they continue manifestly to behave and speak on that basis all they're doing is accumulating more evidence of their behaving and speaking on a counter-Divine Will basis, manifestly violating rights in the process with the results of their agendas.

Such as, for example, the involvement of the Rockefellers in "kneeling" before a symbol that was surreptitiously predicated on a counter-Divine Will symbol from its formation.  An act of worshipful reverence towards a counter-Divine Will basis is hardly an improvement.


Ah.  Closer evaluation demonstrates 'the other guys' effort to greatly imply, under the redaction counter-Divine Will symbolism, that I'd Chosen anything but the same position I have been... and knowingly so.  I'd already addressed that here, their manifest investment in that agenda evidently continues, and it hardly matters.

There are plenty of interpretations I could make of this manifest investment in such an effort, but none are up to standard nor indicative of their True Nature nor permissible by Divine Will.

It's certainly fascinating to watch them continue to 'jump' on the proverbial 'thin ice' of their own kharma though.  Those of us who are manifestly left unprovisioned with the ability to see future events can only theorize what shape the eventual manifestation of such a massive act of Will on a counter-Divine Will basis will look like.

It's certainly not their True Nature to Choose this of course.  And while they manifestly are, it's still not in their True Nature to desire justice not to manifest [they certainly wouldn't desire to be the target of injustice, therefore their True Will favors justice], and so their actual Will remains aligned with Mine, and with Divine Will.  The whole of Creation is in manifest solidarity, with the exception of their manifest position and agendas.  So that's reassuring, and a predictable outcome.  Unless of course there's a retroactive correction made, which would render all this as inconsequential [read: nonexistent] as it always should have been.  In either contingency, the outcome isn't of particular concern to those free and clear of their agenda.  Would that this manifestly included 'the other guys'!

Re: Syntax

Based on some apparent, implied feedback via the ostensibly Jesuit media I may have identified a basis of apparent misunderstanding of concepts and how they're arranged which would account for some of the baffling covert quasi-responses I'd been noticing over the past few days or so.  Again, it's all covert and in addition invalidated by counter-Divine Will symbolism, and so because credibility is voided-out there I can only make a sort of 'best guess' inference; for all I know there was complete mutual understanding all along.  But duty to Divine Will and a sense of forthrightness prompt Me to clarify regardless, just so there's better mutual understanding here.

It seems to regard My reference to the "thief" symbol [Knight of Malta context], and their implication appears to have been more or less, 'Well, if you're demeaning and insulting us, and ascribing a position to us that you know isn't our True Nature, then you're doing no better than we are.'  That seems to be a fair summary approximation of their implied message.  So, I'll clarify.

When someone is Choosing and living in alignment with their own True Nature and the Divine Will that gives it to them, they're recognizing things like rights, duty, quality of life for themselves and those around them, and upholding and promoting same.  Often this means eschewing less worthy alternative options that would conflict with that priority, such as making a best effort to keep standards 'high', and striving to give those who encounter them a plain, accurate understanding by refraining from using counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery; even if they're not particularly using covert symbolism, they make a best effort to avoid that sort of thing regardless so as to enable their Chosen position to be correctly recognized by those who may be.

When you have people investing in pseudo-organizations and agendas which are in conflict with Divine Will and their own True Nature, the manifest result is that this priority of duty isn't acted upon, and invariably those rights, duties, and quality of life are not upheld by them... and eventually, encroached against.  Usually indirectly or subtly at first, and then directly later.  The NWO 2.0 agenda is a good example of this, the NWO 1.0 agenda most certainly was, and in this currently manifest temporal event sequence the Holey Sea for example has actively participated in quite large a number of major 'historical' events which illustrate this concept extremely well.

This behavior is not a 'net benefit' to those it affects, and if it's examined very carefully not even for those Choosing it.  In [manifest] fact it's quite the opposite.  The lifespan of the overt U.S. for example, with its ongoing subversion of a system of governance established to uphold rights provided by Divine Will and our True Nature, and of societal mores that would ensure that the People would uphold those rights even if the government did not, have manifestly been the victims of this sort of agenda, which has been the very opposite of a 'benefit' to society.

It's not anyones' True Nature, let alone is it Divine Will, to be a "thief" [Knight of Malta context].  That's essentially the 'point'.  Their True Nature is valid, benevolent, righteous, and worthy, and so are the manifest results of their Choices.  When they invest in Choices on a lesser basis, such as the manifestly ongoing agendas of 'the other guys', the manifest resultants eventually indicate this with encroachments against rights, genuine education, quality of life, just systems of governance, and literal economics.  Despite their True Nature, they've manifestly invested in, and invested themselves into, the position of such a "thief" - with resulting liabilities towards other people, towards our shared Maker, and ultimately to themselves in the capacity of their own True Nature.  Never mind 'letting the side down', they manifestly let themselves down!

So far as I'm aware, that is the inevitable manifest result of a Choice to live in conflict with Divine Will and someones' own True Nature.  It manifestly has been inaccurately depicted, misrepresented, and even deliberately misstated and recontextualized at times, but regardless of how convincing it may or may not be to others the inherent liability manifestly remains.  It remains kharmically, as an inherent result of their manifest Choices.  In countries where just governance exists, it usually remains in overt law.  And where some inkling among the People of Divine Will principles, just overt law or even just standards of healthy behavior still exist, it remains in the form of the kind of PR resultants I've been describing.

Not because that kind of behavior and its accompanying results are demonstrative of their True Nature, but rather precisely because they are not.

The underlying error is not investing in this or that specific agenda, or even group affiliation with this or that covert pseudo-organization.  The underlying error is of course the investment of Will in Choices which are counter to their own True Nature and to Divine Will.

Which is why agendas contrary to either, whether they're individual, personal agendas or collective group efforts, invariably manifest unworthy, unsatisfying results.  Metaphysically, the effect is quite built-in due to the fixed structure of Creation.  To My knowledge all 'the other guys' have manifestly done or can do is temporarily defer those results.  'Buy now, pay later!'  'Buying the world on credit,' which hardly achieves the anticipated results.

Free Will is certainly respected here.  It's part of the learning process to make free Choices, and even if those with an understanding of Divine Will and Divine Will principles know that the Choices being manifestly made are for something which does not truly exist, in that they're precluded by Divine Will and the True Nature of even those who manifestly Choose them, they're free to make their own investments of Will regardless and we're free to try to show them the distinction.  While they remain acting in error it does preclude including them in our "houses", lest we condone such errors.  And when these manifest, errant Choices have developed enough they invariably encroach against the rights, duties, and quality of life of others around them - against the Will of those others, I should add - and the manifest result of that disharmony tends to be PR effects and court cases, but always kharmic repercussions.  The latter are just inherent in the Choice; the former are rather dependent on the manifest circumstances available.

So, I've been trying for years to show 'the other guys' Divine Will principles, ensure they understand the results of their manifest Choices, and encourage them to correct them by realigning with Divine Will and their own True Nature.  Thus far they appear to continue to Choose their various pseudo-organizations and the counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature agendas and efforts associated with them.  There's no valid basis for this of course, and it's all 'voided out' symbolically through counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery to indicate this and that they could snap their fingers and Choose tomorrow to realign themselves individually and collectively, but in the interim the unworthy manifest resultants of these errant Choices continue.  And this can be used to assert the rights and principles of those others affected by these Choices.

In summary, nobody's worthy, benevolent, sincere, assistive, righteous, fair, courteous and forthright True Nature is in dispute here.  It's simply that their manifest position is not indicative of this, which has more or less been My complaint.  That's been inherent in their manifest Choice not to live by Divine Will and that True Nature.  I believe I've been continually encouraging them to correct that, and particularly the telepaths and propheciers to do so retroactively, but here we manifestly are while they decline so to do.

Until either they do so or the 'creditors' arrive, I suppose.

But I'd thought it only fair and forthright to notify them that the People were hardly likely to put up with it in the meantime.  It's not their True Nature to do so either.


I'm still not alright with accepting perks on a counter-Divine Will and/or a counter-True Nature basis.

It's still a manifest rejection of anyone's True Nature to attempt to negotiate on such a basis.  Not to mention a rejection of Divine Will.

Just as it's a rejection of same to imply that wasn't known already.

Just as it's also a rejection of same to offer to support Divine Will and True Nature, such as with 'teaching' about it, only on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis.

In fact, it's a rejection of Divine Will and True Nature not to Choose in alignment with it in the first place, when that's done knowingly, Willfully, and avoidably.

All of those things cause comparatively minor PR resultants, as Choices which are in conflict with Divine Will and the True Nature of the People tend to do.

Additionally, it's intrinsically objectionable to preset My cause or something close to it under the auspices of a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position.  When you strive to live in alignment with Divine Will and True Nature, it's unworthy to encounter your Choice presented in an unclear state from a lesser basis that's mutually-exclusive with it.

Re: “Recursion”

Readers may find it mildly interesting that we seem to be getting essentially the same implied message from both the pseudo-organizations and the telepaths and propheciers.

The pseudo-organizations have manifestly been implying an effort to get Me to accept a scenario in which they load up their symbolism and imagery with counter-Divine Will symbolism, while simultaneously implying that they're 'not using symbolism, but rather just speaking overtly'.  To accept this would be to accept their manifest ongoing investment in counter-Divine Will efforts and not acknowledge the counter-Divine Will position that such Choices manifestly place them in.  Of course there's no valid basis for them to Choose it in the first place, so accepting less-than-worthy positions and manifest resultants as though they were valid would be for Me to accept a faux-dualism that does not in fact exist, and thus to accept manifest 'suckage' when it's precluded by Divine Will.  I'm not aware of how I can do so while retaining a basis aligned with Divine Will, and it certainly isn't My True Nature to want to do so even if it were feasible.

Meanwhile, the telepaths and propheciers have also been investing in efforts to attempt to cozy up to Me.  The gist of their implied message is essentially, 'That's right, Satori.  We manifest scenarios in which you can overcome and restore the situation, and just so long as you apply Divine Will principles to it you'll be effective.'  To which I have to demur, on the basis of those same Divine Will principles.  Their argument that this is 'just what they do' is precluded by their own True Nature, and the 'suckage' these agendas and various pseudo-organizations have been manifesting is of course precluded by Divine Will itself.  There's no valid nor genuine basis for it, no reason they should want to do this in the first place, and no way to make it make sense in the second.  To suggest that investing in, manifesting, and thus adopting counter-Divine Will positions is 'just what they do' or 'just how it works' attempts to make an argument for that same bogus faux-duality the rank-and-file of the pseudo-organizations have been making, and that argument is no better - and the position no more valid - coming from the telepaths and propheciers.  Affirming Divine Will, True Nature, and rallying support for these among the People by example is just common sense; acting in systematic and ongoing opposition to their own True Nature not to mention Divine Will and thus manifesting 'suckage' doesn't, and doesn't cause Me to feel particularly cozy with those manifestly knowingly, Willfully and avoidably doing it.

Manifestly, the invalid position of these pseudo-organizations is essentially the same as the invalid position of the telepaths and propheciers.  The former appears to be a result of the "absurd" Choice for latter.  Accepting a basis of relationship that's founded on a presented counterfeit of their True Nature would of course be "absurd", and the resulting 'suckage' would be less than worthy and manifest a "theft" [Knights of Malta context] of manifest value from Me.

That kind of a manifestly invalid basis relegates the position of both these pseudo-organizations, and the assembly of telepaths and propheciers, to a position of invalidated authority while those retaining alignment with Divine Will and their own True Nature have also retained valid authority.  The manifest refusal to recognize that and act on the distinction, which I notice has been decreasing but still present and Chosen, is just a resultant of their manifestly ongoing Choice to reject their own True Nature.  Which of course is also unacceptable.

The sort of PR resultants I'd mentioned presumably continue to manifest as the pseudo-organizations imply efforts to 'rig the elections' and 'locate and identify those Choosing Divine Will' - if nothing else, even implying that isn't respectful to Divine Will.  The assembly of telepaths and propheciers have their own equivalent to that PR effect; the buildup of conflict between their True Nature and their manifestly-Chosen counter-Divine Will position and the 'suckage' it manifests must be resulting in some undesirable moral, emotional and psychological internal conflicts that I surely wouldn't want to experience and neither do they.  To Choose against everything you actually want is pretty silly, particularly when the apparent duress which ostensibly causes you to is all contrivance manifested in an effort to make such a Choice appear to make sense.  Essentially, these pseudo-organizations have been 'a plot device', something established as part of the effort to make an "absurd" Choice appear credible and plausible as without that, it cannot acquire belief and acceptance from others.

Without the investment from the People, these pseudo-organizations would not manifest.  Without the "absurd" Choice from the telepaths and propheciers, there would not have been investment from the People in them.  And it's hardly in keeping with their True Nature not to mention Divine Will for the telepaths and propheciers to have invested in such a Choice.  The more Willfully, knowingly and avoidably a Choice is made, the more intense of an act of Will it is, and so the principals making that Choice encounter the brunt of its manifest resultants including the kharma that comes from the dissonance of that Choice with Divine Will and their own True Nature.

Choosing a Divine Will- and True Nature-aligned basis is certainly easy, particularly in comparison... but that self-evidently isn't what either those within the pseudo-organizations and the assemblage of telepaths and propheciers have manifestly been Choosing.  Nevetheless, both Divine Will and their True Nature are constants and absolutes.  Only the literal and often symbolic "time" they manifestly Choose in the meanwhile is unestablished.

More detail

I've noticed that the ostensibly Jesuit media have been making quite an effort to imply to Me that the recent 'news' regarding London was actually spurious, and that as such there was no loss of literal life there, and thus the PR effect was negligible.  If it was anything like the scenarios in the overt States it was presumably a legitimate practice effort for something else, which the media then featured as though it were actually a manifested spontaneous event.

I'm not certain I understand how much better it is for PR to have an international pseudo-organization presenting a part of itself as a service which legitimately informs the public about current events, and yet systematically defrauds the public for the perceived geopolitical advantage of its pseudo-organization.  Nor how organizing covertly to manifest 'suckage' overtly does so.  I get that they're using counter-Divine Will imagery and symbolism as a sort of disclaimer to essentially disavow the accuracy of their content, but this sort of a disclaimer isn't something that everyone in the public is aware of.  So innocents, or at least what passes for innocents in modern society, would appear to be manifestly detrimented and manipulated by these pseudo-organizations systematically and routinely for the perceived benefit of these pseudo-organizations.  A quick perusal of social media would appear to confirm the widespread results of this.

As someone Choosing to retain an alignment with Divine Will, that disclaimer doesn't always come across effectively even with familiarity with the symbolism.  There's sometimes a legitimate need, usually prompted by duty, to address spontaneous manifest scenarios that contain within them some inherent counter-Divine Will symbolism that nobody intends or at least that I certainly don't.  And it doesn't seem much of a distinguishing characteristic to have counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery used to negate credibility by pseudo-organizations which are themselves behaving on a counter-Divine Will basis, and even doing so routinely and systematically.

We'd encountered the same kind of phenomenon at My "house"; although we use "absurdity" to demonstrate that something is clearly risible and dysfunctional, that meaning is lost when the speaker is themselves acting upon a basis of "absurdity", of Willful disharmony and misalignment with Divine Will principles.  That is, it's not communicated effectively that something is senseless, dysfunctional and silly when the basis of the person speaking is founded on similar Choices.  So here, when a pseudo-organization uses counter-Divine Will symbolism and imagery to indicate negation or invalidation, and yet it also exists on the basis of a counter-Divine Will position and even regularly benefits from so doing, the implications for the nature and status of that pseudo-organization, and for any arrangements made by others with it, to be just as void, negated, invalid become rather self-evident.

The inherent notion of an absolute dualism, that is, 'Divine Will and [something else which is precluded by Divine Will]', is fundamentally erroneous.  So when you have anything, such as a pseudo-organization or an arrangement, that's founded upon what in an Absolute sense is nothing, despite perhaps having something manifestly there it's still... bogus.  Void.  Negated.  Invalidated quite inherently by Divine Will.  Attempts to apply a system of fairness to enforce such arrangements or to legitimatize such pseudo-organizations would require either misusing a working system, or exploiting a dysfunctional one.  Either way, it's not a righteous approach and would result in PR resultants.  Even if it didn't, it would still manifest inherent kharmic resultants.  It's the inevitable result of investing Will into something that's predicated on a counter-Divine Will basis.

It's been implied that the 'core group' within 'the other guys' intends to show up later, once the public has been thoroughly subverted, and lay claim to everything on a Divine Will basis.  It's not apparent how they intend to do this, because at that juncture they would have presumably have a position that was established through plenty of benefit from efforts by pseudo-organizations on a counter-Divine Will basis.  I understand that they consist of people used to doing all manner of similar restructuring in the corporate realm using 'shell corporations' and the like, but it's not feasible to exploit the metaphysical flaws in Divine Will principles because they're not only absolutes, they are quite perfect.  Manifestly, overt tax dodges exist.  Kharmic dodges do not.

Freedom involves receiving the manifest resultants of your own Choices, and some of those manifest resultants come in the form of kharmic accountability.  If they didn't, the system of receiving the manifestations of your own acts of Will would not be perfect.  To avoid that kind of accountability would mean that you'd be making Choices, and not encountering their manifestations.  Self-evidently, to desire that would be to desire an impotent Will.  It's not easy to consider, for example, Babylonian Gnostic occultists desiring that.  That would be the position of a literal 'minor' who is in need of someone to take custody of their Choices to provide stewardship for them.  Interestingly, that formula already appears to be understood by them; they've been employing it with the People with regard to their relationship with the overt state for quite some while now.  So-called 'corporate limited liability' for example, or 'the Nanny State', the idea that the state alone should take responsibility - and control - for so many aspects of their own lives.  So it's counter intuitive to fathom Babylonian Gnostics for example who put so much emphasis on manifesting the results of their own acts of Will, yet also seem reluctant to encounter some of those manifestations.

Divine Will principles are there to keep those acts of Will quite worthy, so that their manifestations can also be worthy, desirable and more than satisfactory.  To understand, indeed to accept!, that is to appreciate Divine Will and accept its basis into your lives.