Re: Divine Will fraud, Qasem

A few items to address, the first covert and the latter overt. I’m not too sure about the covert actually being an intentional investment, or whether it was merely something that resembles a covert investment ‘the other guys’ have already used and keep handy for certain situations. I’ve been attempting to ascertain which, but rather than take up more literal time I should probably just provide clarity for the strategy anyway since non-current media suggests that it’s a narrative ‘the other guys’ keep in stock. Continue reading "Re: Divine Will fraud, Qasem"

“Life”, rights and Divine Will

Just going over a few things here.  And reaffirming My Choice for Divine Will- and True Nature-aligned position, not that anyone actually needs Me to reiterate it.

The covert subtext of the Trump summit appeared to be a whole lot of counter-Divine Will symbolism and worrying, concerning stuff. The eventual outcome also featured counter-Divine Will symbolism, with what would have been an inversion symbol were it being ‘spoken’ in the covert language of My “House”, and a basic ‘commitment’ symbol of ‘the other guys’. As if, after all the buildup, they were making a Choice to express and affirm True Nature and a Divine Will-aligned position… which of course they manifestly weren’t, and no amount of inversion symbolism would appear to correct a counter-Divine Will basis either logistically or symbolically. But the implied ‘message’, inasmuch as anything on a counter-Divine Will basis can be said to have a legitimate, trustworthy ‘message’ was that, ‘Don’t you know that whatever happens, we’re upholding Divine Will and True Nature because we know it just as you do?’.

If only that had manifestly been the case. Continue reading "“Life”, rights and Divine Will"

A followup

It appears that the non-credible nature of ‘the other guys’ effort, evident from its counter-Divine Will basis, is confirmed. That is to say, that the implied effort to allege less than integrous efforts on My part were themselves less than sincere. The implied rationale from them now seems to be, in essence, ‘Well, we were doing it on a counter-Divine Will basis, so of course it was insincere. You should’ve known that we wouldn’t actually go through with it. What, you doubt Divine Will?’ The telepaths and propheciers have manifestly used that argument as well, and the People probably deserve some correction of that sophistry. I’ll cite some examples to illustrate and try to keep it brief. Continue reading "A followup"

Re: Another apparent attempt to exploit lack of clarity

Since Babylon and Rome are to the best of My knowledge franchises of a manifestly rogue assemblage of telepaths and propheciers, it will come as no surprise to them that I reject the recent counter-Divine Will basis they’ve been covertly implying and, by all appearances, attempting to sell Me. Continue reading "Re: Another apparent attempt to exploit lack of clarity"

Re: ‘Grace’, supplemental

Due to ‘the other guys’’ manifest continued investment in a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position, the nature of their recent agenda appears to have become clear. ‘Language lessons’ in their covert symbolism, ostensibly to better equip Me to seek manifest justice in this matter, in return for acceptance of their manifest counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position… at which point, I’d be unable to achieve it. Continue reading "Re: ‘Grace’, supplemental"