Author: Satori

I continue to find no relevant, new or worthwhile implication from ‘the other guys’ on a counter-Divine Will basis: nothing which would make a case which would mitigate accountability for their manifest Choice for a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis for reason of it being anything other than knowing, Willful, deliberate, avoidable and systematic. Continue reading "Re: ‘Grace’, additional"

In the rather unlikely even that it hasn’t been perfectly clear, I should probably make it so that a knowing, Willful and avoidable counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis is quite unacceptable to Me. And that addressing Me on a basis which knowingly, Willfully and avoidably rejects with someones’ True Nature is both non-credible and to the best of My knowledge a lost cause. Continue reading "Re: ‘Grace’"

'The other guys' appear to have presented a Divine Will principles fallacy amidst a complex and comparatively sophisticated bout of covert narratives. All these are on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. They don’t represent their genuine feelings or position, they’re not particularly sincere, and in the course of presenting them they’ve also been presenting many overt narratives for globalization besides. In order to address the core Divine Will fallacy, I’ll need to address the other narratives in order to get to that core implied argument. I’ll attempt to keep this as brief as is reasonably possible, while being thorough enough to remain coherent. Continue reading "Re: The recent sophistry, and a refutation using Divine Will principles"

Getting a better sense of what 'the other guys' are presenting.  Ms. Haley's recent speech at the 'United Nations Security Council' was most informative as a presentation of the covert pattern. Continue reading "Re: ‘Another context’, confirmation"

It seems 'the other guys' have manifestly not yet made the Choice to align with and uphold Divine Will and their own True Nature, and abandon a position - and symbolism indicating as much - that's mutually-exclusive with that.  It also appears that their 'offer' was simply to continue as they had been, only revise and upgrade their presentation of it.  I'm precluded by My own True Nature and alignment with Divine Will from accepting such a basis.  Manifestly, the telepaths and propheciers continue to default on the True Nature- and Divine Will-aligned basis that I'd established, and they'd opted into, as My basis for Working with them. Continue reading "Re: ‘Another context’, additional"

This is My first reasonable opportunity recently to respond to what appears to be yet another offer from 'the other guys'.  In all honesty I'm not entirely sure what it is they've been seeking to present, though I've certainly been hearing them out.  I'll describe My best interpretation of what they seem to be presenting, evaluate that per Divine Will principles, and if My understanding of their presentation is less than complete we'll at least have a sense of what, if anything, remains to be clarified. Continue reading "Re: ‘Another context’"

More covertly-implied efforts on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis to 'haggle'.  If I'm reading it right [despite the invalidating nature of a counter-Divine Will basis, that is], it appears to be as follows:  'We'll continue on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis and continue encroaching, but we'll add an additional covert messaging system to teach everyone about Divine Will principles in return for your joining with us permanently, and adopting a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis yourself.'  This is evident in the 'news items' about a French police officer who "swapped his life for that of a hostage", and the Russian shopping plaza incident, as well as various other covert implications in the course of reporting on other 'news items'. Continue reading "Re: More ‘haggling’"

With the onset of the Russian spy news, 'the other guys' have manifestly been working another covertly-implied effort to forestall the requirement to uphold a standard of Divine Will and True Nature.  It remains unacceptable, and I had to scan it for a while to determine whether they were even serious.  It appears to be an attempt to get Me to accept personnel which self-identify as both aligning with My "house", and that of 'the other guys', and harmonize the symbolism.  A sort of '50 / 50' arrangement. Continue reading "Choices, and accountability"

Another covertly-implied argument from 'the other guys' on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. Essentially, 'We've manifestly Chosen a position in which we've rejected Divine Will, jettisoned our True Nature, and relinquished a position referred to symbolically as "living". Since we're existing without all the things that we hold so dear, surely an existence without those things is punishment enough?' Continue reading "Re: Enforcement, additional"

Within a counter-Divine Will context, 'the other guys' have apparently been implying a forceful response in the event that I improperly transgress against them. Continue reading "Re: Enforcement"