I’ve been considering the manifest situation with great care. Given how much of the apostate system’s implied presentments I freely admit I haven’t completely understood, it’s possible that I’d formed some inaccurate assessments or interpretations about them. The Roman and Babylonian systems have manifestly relied greatly upon eliciting acceptance from outsiders; Mine relies upon insisting upon, asserting, and upholding principles, especially Divine Will principles. Principles and the gaining of acceptance are not in and of themselves mutually exclusive. At least in theory that suggests that a worthy arrangement for all concerned is achievable. It’s seemed rather unlikely to Me, but the apostate system frequently commends itself on accomplishing the seemingly impossible. Both systems recognize that the manifest circumstances are not always an accurate depiction of what can be manifest, or the True State of Creation.
It seems of great importance to the apostate system to achieve some kind of mutually-acceptable arrangement, and for My part both duty to Divine Will and ordinary, basic compassion have Me reluctant to needlessly manifest ‘suckage’ for so many currently personnel who currently self-identify with the apostate system. So I’ve asked Myself, ‘What indeed would it take to gain My acceptance?’
I have some preliminary thoughts on that, all Divine Will-derived. The thing is, even the non-overtly implied desire of those self-identifying with the apostate system to gain Redemption has been presented on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis which is inherently non-credible. When someone is knowingly, Willfully and avoidably Choosing a basis of rejecting Divine Will, and their own True Nature which derives from that, what they have to say has no guaranteed credibility nor sincerity, and as such can’t properly be ‘heard’. It’s certainly everyones’ True Nature to want to align with Divine Will, but when that True Nature [and indeed, Divine Will] is being rejected, then claims to want to align with it are essentially a non sequitor.
I had started to draft a more generous and conciliatory response, but found I had to delete it because it doesn’t appear to Me that it would’ve been permissible within the Choice to align with and uphold Divine Will. Because, ‘Response to what, exactly? On the manifest basis of a Choice to reject Divine Will, and the True Nature which it confers, nothing credible or reliable has genuinely been said.’ What is the appropriate response when someone else intimates that they have a desire to realign with Divine Will, while interspersing their message with all manner of blasphemies? Scoffing at them would seem rather impolite.
The foundations of commercial law tell us that we aren’t obliged to accept presented offers unconditionally, nor should we dishonor them by summarily rejecting them outright. As such, conditional acceptance is usually the best response. But it appears to Me that, per Divine Will principles and the standards of My “house”, I can’t even get started on most of those conditions while the vital necessity for a Divine Will- and True Nature-aligned basis remains manifestly unsatisfied. For Me to stop what I’m doing so that I can entertain offers on a basis which is clearly, knowingly, Willfully and avoidably declared as inherently lacking in sincerity and credibility would be for Me to tarry with blasphemous untruths from others, on the reasoning that I might achieve some gain by it. Which could, itself, be misconstrued as acceptance on My part of a basis which rejects Divine Will and True Nature both.
Since it’s not in accordance with My Divinely-conferred True Nature to dismiss the concerns, or possible concerns, of others in a casual, brusque and cavalier manner, I thought it best to provide good, clear communication in ‘good faith’ and describe My position and the nature of the situation from here. This is in accordance with the common law maxim, ‘Matters must be expressed to be resolved.’ I absolutely want this manifest scenario to be resolved. [Amicably, I mean. It'll get resolved per Divine Will regardless.] It’s just that we appear to be manifestly operating on a fundamentally incompatible basis; Divine Will and True Nature, and the manifest rejection of same.