Ordinarily the literal news would have registered My response by now. It seems it has not. Perhaps it’s literally a bit late in reacting, or alternatively someone could be seeking confirmation from Me of a rejection of the implied ‘offer’ on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. It’s a comparatively minor thing, and whichever is manifestly the case My response continues just the same.
I manifestly continue to Choose a Divine Will- and True Nature-aligned basis. It’s the basis of My authority, as well as the source of everything I truly want. Things presented on a basis which aren’t in harmony with that, which are mutually-exclusive with it, and which ultimately have no existence beyond the fleetingly manifest, are without the scope of My Will. My duty to Divine Will and My own True Nature, let alone to My “house”, necessarily require Me to reject such presentments.
They’ve manifestly been presented on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis and satisfy the reasonable and benevolent criteria of ‘knowingly, Willfully and avoidably’ so.
The telepaths and propheciers have manifestly been presenting things to Me on such a basis for literally quite a while now, and I’ve had to reject them for precisely the same reason. Once I was able to ascertain that this was done ‘knowingly, Willfully and avoidably’ on their part of course. That hadn’t been quite apparent and confirmable at the literal onset of it of course, in part because it was so unthinkable. But they’ve manifestly demonstrated that this was so, and what’s more quite systematically as well. So I must continue to insist on merely the terms by which they’d accepted to Work with Me: on a continued basis of aligning with, and upholding, Divine Will and their own True Nature. They’ve so far continued to default and renege on that, which as I’ve described must result manifestly in no small amount of incongruity and instability on an internal basis for them as they manifestly defy their own raison d’etre individually, collectively, and organizationally.
The implied proffered fallacy appears to directly correspond between the system of the telepaths and propheciers, and the system of the Babylonians. Specifically, to seek approval from external organizations and authorities for the knowing, Willful, avoidable and systematic use of counter-Divine Will or counter-True Nature symbolism and imagery, under the auspices of it ostensibly being, 'not what was sincerely meant' and to 'just ignore that'. And then it just manifestly accumulates, without objection. I and My "house" do indeed find it quite objectionable, but there is a vital distinction between ignoring or disregarding something, and providing a certain amount of grace for inadvertent manifest human error and limitations of circumstance. Grace is part of our True Nature, deriving as it does from Divine Will. Grace as an imputed substitute for justice most certainly is not. But let's suppose for the purposes of exposition that My "house" did otherwise, and routinely and systematically penalized its personnel for things which we weren't reasonably certain were 'knowing, Willful and avoidable'. In such a scenario, we'd be responding in a manner which was not representative of our True Nature, and in not making a best effort Choice to respond fairly, we'd find ourselves in direct conflict with Divine Will as well. Since we strive to uphold Divine Will and True Nature, such a position would be essentially antithetical. It would have us observing the form of the thing, of linguistics and symbolism, at the expense of its substance, Divine Will and True Nature. Divine Will principles tell us that this cannot be the correct assessment, and the fallacy manifestly appears to be amply demonstrated in the organized quasi-religious hypocrisy of the Pharisees. We can surely do better than that.
While I’m on the subject, I should probably describe what could otherwise appear as a seeming ‘double standard’ on the ‘knowing, Willful and avoidable’ criteria with regard to the telepaths and propheciers. The first item there should be comparatively self-evident; they’re certainly aware of the situation by definition, and this is corroborated by their non-overt behavior and responses. ‘Willful’ is demonstrated by the manifest fact that their counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis is continuous and systematic. And as for ‘avoidable’, even non-overt symbolic gaffes and errors are retroactively correctable for them by definition, so when that retroactive correction hasn’t manifestly occurred it’s a summary indicator of the kind of Choice into which they’ve been manifestly investing their Will, effort and other resources. It’s roughly the corollary of the common law maxim, ‘No one is required to do what is impossible’; when something is demonstrably possible for someone and they yet refuse to do it, resulting in a manifest violation, their manifest liability is inherent there. When someone isn’t capable of doing any better, there’s room for grace. But when they are, and refuse, grace would be inappropriate as it would usurp the interests of justice.
Likewise with the maxim, ‘A matter must be expressed to be resolved’. That’s ordinarily so, but in the case of an assemblage which has repeatedly demonstrated a propensity to not only read the minds of those involved [even without permission, which is surely a manifest rights violation in itself] and the ability for information supremacy irrespective of literal time, many things can be fairly taken as read by them. So I’ve long thought it only right to hold them to quite a different standard on the basis of their superior capabilities; the same of course is not applicable in the other direction, for reasons which are presumably self-evident.
So this ought to clarify any current matters of concern or interest, and provide a bonus amount of additional clarity as well.