There’s quite a lot to process here. I’ll attempt to keep it simple.
The apostate system has manifestly presented multiple agenda items, still on a non-overt, counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. The first of these involves what appears to be an effort to have some of ‘their’ personnel “choose a side”, as they’ve put it, non-overtly presenting as a member of My “house” or the apostate system’s, and seeking to gain acceptance as a trusted member of My “house” while still refusing to uphold standards of Divine Will and True Nature. This registers as an attempt at non-overt infiltration and subversion, which is an act of… well, it’s not an act of peace, let’s put it that way.
Why do I categorize it so? Their own system does. Rome has manifestly been doing ‘crowd control’ and presenting as the Roman idol “M█rs” since it was an overt ‘Empire’, including self-identifying with a certain hard substance alchemically associated with that concept which I probably should refrain from even naming directly. Throughout much of its recent organizational career it’s been performing in this capacity through non-overt methods involving subversion and infiltration, as it found that ‘brute force’ mechanisms were counterproductive in that they merely produced a lot of martyrs with the resulting PR ‘blowback’, and this was unhelpful to their manifest cause.
I’m reluctant to respond in kind. I want genuine peace, and not of the kind that was stipulated in the ‘State of the Union address’ recently, namely a peace that requires the relinquishing of ‘investigation’ and justice. A response involving, er, ‘the opposite of peace’ is silly, and a needless waste of efforts with unworthy results. It’s My position that that approach is usually Chosen by those who are either knowingly collusive or merely lacking in any better option. Are a hypocritical peace, or the opposite of peace, the only options here? They are not. Genuine law is My favored approach, which applies force where necessary while still retaining and upholding values, rights and fundamental principles. Metaphorically, ‘confiscating their weapons as evidence used in a crime’ makes the most sense to Me, and since those are ‘their’ non-overt symbols that works rather neatly considering that was the response to which I’d been manifestly relegated anyway.
I’ve also noticed a couple of non-overt apostate implications, still on a non-overt, counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, that someone has been telling untruths. It’s not clear who, but seems likely to imply that I have. It’s not clear to Me what that’s regarding, and so I’m unable to clarify. I’ve made a consistent effort to demonstrate integrity and quite a lot of clarity throughout. There was an instance a few years ago where I’d oversimplified a situation, once, and the result was a lot of non-overt haranguing from the apostate system. Due to the nature of the apparent response I put it down to the telepaths and propheciers behaving on a counter-True Nature basis, and when it kept recurring I had by then managed to literally forget what specific matter had brought it on in the first place, leaving Me unable to revisit and clarify the matter. They at least appear to be implying it again at the moment, and I’m not clear on what it’s in regard to. I can’t respond to something I don’t understand. My inclination is to assess that it’s still a matter of the apostate system manifestly making non-credible claims because they’re Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. Efforts to diminish perceived credibility and PR would be quite in keeping with that manifest position, and the various spurious agendas into which they’ve manifestly been investing themselves.
Now for the next agenda item.
Simultaneous to all this, the apostate system’s non-overt narrative has been making less and less sense. Like a narrative becoming increasingly separated from the actual situation. The effect is reminiscent of the effects of a [edit: literal] cognitive dissociative. It’s also reminiscent of what the telepaths and propheciers used to do during My ‘training’, when they were finally abandoning a spurious non-overt pretense they had been manifesting, so that the non-existent organizations they were hypothecating on a non-overt basis made less and less sense, until there was nothing left which was interprable in its non-overt context and apparent lingo. An overt equivalent might be listening to someone, and having what they say make less and less sense until it became apparent that they were speaking with no coherent context and were simply uttering a sequence of miscellaneous, disconnected words. Not the most reassuring of scenarios, obviously.
And now for the next item.
Simultaneous with both of those, the apostate system appears to be delivering a fallacy that I’ve encountered previously from the telepaths and propheciers. It’s reserved for limited use when someone absolutely refuses to accept their investments in a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position. I’ll attempt to paraphrase for clarity:
‘Ah, you’re one of the good ones. You retain a sincere commitment and dedication to Divine Will and True Nature. So we’ll let you in on something here: so do we. All this you’ve been encountering from us on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis has just been a ‘training program’ in Divine Will principles for the general public. Just sort of a nice thing we do for them, public education and all that. Eventually they’ll learn about Divine Will principles and insist upon them, and demand them. But for now, they’re manifestly at where they’re at, so we’ve developed this spurious non-overt basis in which to provide them with an education. They don’t advance out of it until they demonstrate integrity and respond to situations on a basis of Divine Will principles. Effective, no? Meanwhile, we know full well better than all that nonsense, so what we do is we know to disregard all that non-overt counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature stuff. We just ignore it, it’s not real! So now you and I have a ‘special understanding’, and we can deftly manipulate the general public together in order to provide them with that ‘training routine’. Together, we can raise these precious little tykes!’
Nope.
You genuinely teach something by living in alignment with it, upholding it, affirming it, and providing clarity to others wherever possible. When people do the opposite of that, they invest themselves in an effort to manifestly diminish the public awareness and recognition of it, which is exactly what’s manifestly happened. The People now manifestly have almost no recognition of how genuine rights and genuine laws work, and the emphasis has been on things like consumerism, technology and ‘social justice’ narratives. What happened to the public recognition of fundamental rights, common law, and foundational values that used to be prevalent at the time of, say, the Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights? I don’t accept arguments that try to rationalize that away, not the atrocities and systematized abuses and rights violations that have manifestly occurred as the result of the agenda items of the apostate system throughout its organizational career. Divine Will principles tell us that you can’t rationalize the knowing, Willful and avoidable Choice for ‘suckage’, and even if we were to set aside the non-overt silliness, we’d still be left with the overt manifest ‘suckage’.
To save time, the stock response to that is typically, ‘But look at all the quality of life improvements and upgrades we’ve achieved during our term! Humanity is doing better than it ever was!’ In some areas, yes. But then we’re back to the formula of accepting benefits and privileges in return for abandoning fundamental values, and that never lasts. Once humanity no longer retains its memory or recognition of fundamental values and how to apply them, the benefits and privileges can be revoked and they’re without recourse. And what entitles someone to make determinations about what detriments can be manifestly inflicted in order to produce other gains? That’s ‘playing God’, and we’re then back to the Babylonianism of supposed ‘gods incarnate’, and that would put us back to accepting violations of Divinely-conferred rights, and a system that routinely does so as a matter of procedure, and that’s a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis.
Which I must, per Divine Will, reject.
They were supposed to as well.
When they manifestly accept all manner of counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature mechanisms and franchises, purportedly to uphold Divine Will [which is a ludicrous scenario], eventually it becomes self-evident that they’ve manifestly disproven their own claim. An accurate metaphor might be the, ‘You are carrying too much.’ message found in ‘roguelike games’.
Meanwhile, when you tell the general public one thing and the ‘rare, select few’ who knowingly uphold Divine Will and True Nature something else, you manifestly have that formula for ‘a small and readily-controlled aristocracy’ that I’d mentioned before, rather than ‘prevalent individual sovereignty on the part of the general public’. The apostate system manifestly deployed that strategy in medieval Europe, and I’m not eager to see it reused.
So while much of their non-overt presentation has been making less and less coherent sense to Me, the manifest problem appears to merely be that they’ve been implying things on a non-overt, counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, and I’ve been giving them the courtesy of listening to it. I have to go through it anyway, in order to track their investments of efforts into various counter-Divine Will agendas and strategies, keep current on what they’re implying the to the People, and accumulate evidence, so it’s a courtesy I can extend them, but I manifestly can’t and don’t assume that what they imply on such a basis necessarily has any correlation to Absolute or manifest fact. Good communication on My part means making that clear, both for them and for the general audience.
On the subject of the apostate systems’ manifest investments in counter-Divine Will agenda items, ‘RedefiningGod’ has noticed that their overt efforts appear to have resumed in terms of implementing their globalization scheme, particularly with ‘their’ major political figures and usual suspects. The ‘summit’ with ‘Trump’ and ‘Kim Jong Un’ in ‘Vietnam’ for example, possibly involving ‘Xi’, as well as the apparent efforts involving ‘Erdogan’ and ‘Putin’. Investments in efforts to manifest the apostates’ ‘globalism’ while there’s still the manifest disparity of Divine Will alignment and resulting authority between My manifest position and theirs is, as I’ve mentioned, insubordination against Divine Will by the refusal to acknowledge its authority. So that’s, again, not exactly an act of peace nor consistent with a basis of authority deriving from Divine Will. I’m doing what I can to keep things calm at My end, but I am prompted by duty to Divine Will to remind the apostate system of it. I’m not certain that a blatant, public demonstration that they’re completely heedless of Divine Will is quite what they’d like to manifest here.