Re: Apostate ‘mentoring’

I’m don’t have certainty that this is an effort that the apostate system has manifestly been making, but it seems likely and if so I have a duty to respond openly and clearly about it. As such, this is more intended as a hypothesis or a suspicion than accusation.

On a non-overt, counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, the apostates seem at least to be investing in the following: Something which is designed to appear to Me as a subtle and discrete ‘mentoring’ of ‘their’ rank and file in Divine Will principles, while instead appearing to the supposedly ‘uneducated’ rank and file as ‘business as usual’ for the apostate system. In doing this, the apparent effort was to get Me to accept with the apostate system a tacit arrangement on a counter-Divine Will basis, and thus forfeit My basis and thus legitimacy.

I of course would have rejected this had the apparent presentment been clear to Me sooner. I’m still not entirely confident that this has been their effort, but it would explain so much symbolism over the last month or so, and if My hypothesis is accurate I certainly need to address it.

The Choice to align with and uphold Divine Will and True Nature is of course a prerequisite for legitimacy of authority. ‘Teaching’ others about it while simultaneously rejecting it not only would be hypocritical, it would impair relationships and nullify the trust so necessary for communication, let alone ‘education’. That’s manifestly the same problem I’ve been having with the telepaths and propheciers.

Who interestingly enough appear to have been making efforts to put Me in the know about the apparent effort by the apostates. It certainly appears to be there in retrospect, presented on a disappointing counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. As should have been anticipated, I found it non-credible and even contemptible for reason of that counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, didn’t bother interpreting it from the symbolism of My “house” precisely because it was a rejection of our standards, was instead outraged at the manifestly continuing investment in a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, and found it useful only as a sample of Jesuit and Babylonian symbolism. I think that Choice on My part was not only legitimate, all told it was indeed correct as well.

As I do keep stating, it doesn’t matter what permutations of a Choice for a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis are made, nor who makes them. It’s always unworthy, and eminently rejectable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *