The apostate system, manifestly still Choosing to invest in a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position, appears to be investing in efforts on a non-overt basis to have some of ‘their’ personnel seek to gain acceptance within the standards of My “house” while still Choosing to both not uphold its standards, and retain their positions within the apostate quasi-organizations. Perhaps they’re simply ‘going through the motions’ with it; the credibility remains negligible regardless, and all that according to the existing standards My “house” has had for literal years now.
Casual, avoidable usage of counter-Divine Will symbolism, without apparent effort to find alternate wording or eliminate the reference altogether, are a common giveaway. This applies not only to specific words and terms, but also idioms which deploy them, corporate names, and even casual usage of needless and easily-avoidable, even unnecessary, imagery of unpleasantness, unworthy conditions, and other forms of manifest ‘suckage’.
Then there are the group identifiers for the apostate system and its various franchise quasi-organizations, which My personnel would typically seek to reword or avoid when reasonably feasible. Along with that, investments in the various manifest narratives and agendas of the apostate system and its franchises. Equivalent to group self-identification terms, but on an even more tangible basis. [This includes agendas on an overt and on a non-overt basis, mind.] It should be remembered that the apostate system is manifestly, well, apostate. That is, Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. Consequently, its manifest position is mutually-exclusive with that of My “house” and its personnel. It’s hardly legitimate to imply a Choice for both a Divine Will-aligned and a counter-Divine Will basis, self-evidently.
If it weren’t so manifestly unworthy, the situation could otherwise be moderately interesting: Everyones’ True Nature in alignment with Divine Will, but the manifest Choices of many of them investing in the Choice for a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. And within that limited scope and context, making apparent efforts to persuade Me and Mine that they’re truly in support of Divine Will and their own True Nature. Well of course they are. Their current effort appears, however, more precisely to involve seeking to pass off a manifestly counter-Divine Will Choice as a Divine Will-aligned Choice, and gain acceptance for it on that basis. It’s unworthy and less than genuine however, and quite demonstrably so.
If I’m reading the [non-credible] implications correctly, and I’m not entirely sure that I am, they seem also to have referenced some kind of an implied and imminent ‘elapsed time’ moment, after which they’d simply manifestly default and yield. This appeared to be followed up with an implication that, if only I’d refrain from calling out counter-Divine Will positions and Choices in the meantime, an ‘orderly transition’ of their personnel to My “house” could be arranged. And that if I instead continued affirming and upholding Divine Will and True Nature, such an ‘orderly transition’ would be disrupted. That registers with Me as the likely makings of yet another effort to either establish a narrative or proffer some kind of temptation on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis [which is of course additionally non-credible]. My authority derives from Divine Will; as such those kinds of scenarios are precluded.
I’ve been evaluating what specifically would make a literal ‘time-based’ yielding on the part of the apostates so non-credible in addition to the obvious, that is, the counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis upon which it’s manifestly been presented. The answer per Divine Will principles is somewhat interesting, and I think I’ll share it here. Just as with the telepaths’ and propheciers’ recent manifest spurious implications regarding Me, we find ourselves again left to ask, ‘By what authority was that purportedly established?’. Rome, Babylon and the telepaths and propheciers have all manifestly Chosen a spurious counter-Divine Will basis. Authority derives from alignment with Divine Will. It rather seems that unless My agenda items are directly countermanded by our Creator Himself, we can confidently rely on My Will retaining supremacy and remaining in effect here. And somehow, I rather can’t accept the idea of our Creator authorizing a counter-Divine Will basis which is mutually-exclusive with everything that truly exists, even on a literally temporary basis. It would appear, according to Divine Will principles, that Rome, Babylon, and the telepaths and propheciers have manifestly been acting against their own understood basis of metaphysical legitimacy ab initio, from the moment they manifestly commenced rejecting a Divine Will-aligned basis. Translation: They’ve manifestly been acting against their own rules all along. Which would only make sense, as the basis upon which they’ve manifestly been acting is necessarily in direct, abject and mutually-exclusive conflict with their own True Nature.
My Chosen basis remains just as it has been, however: to remain aligned with, and to uphold, Divine Will and True Nature.