I'm still evaluating covert data samples of 'the other guys'' covert 'this-or-that' routine I'd mentioned. It's still predicated on a counter-Divine Will basis, making it both non-credible and unacceptable due to the standards of My "house", and that is both where this assessment begins and where it will end. The whole reason for processing any of this is due to the manifest nature of the situation, in which errant personnel nevertheless invest themselves in patterns and efforts which are predicated on such a counter-Divine Will basis, and I seek to provide them with assistance in correcting that manifest tendency.
So, this spurious premise that's predicated on a counter-Divine Will basis. Specifically, the 'this-or-that' pattern that's predicated on a void basis appears to be the 'this' of a contingent of 'the other guys' insisting on retaining a counter-Divine Will basis, and a 'that' faction who desire to reject that basis and seek to realign with Divine Will. So we have things which are accurate and true being presented, with inversion or counter-Divine Will symbolism, as part of a scenario whereby the appearance of "dividing the People into separate groups" is presented.
Let's pause that and examine it. You take a bogus, non-credible and unacceptable position. Then you 'divide it in twain'. Neither resulting 'half' is going to suddenly become valid, credible nor acceptable.
Incidentally, those desiring a Divine Will-aligned position act manifestly against their own interests and principles in Choosing a counter-Divine Will basis from which to do so. This not only includes counter-Divine Will imagery and symbolism, but also the position of ambiguity presented by this scenario.
Additionally, the whole premise that there's even a contingent of people who sincerely want a counter-Divine Will position in the first place is spurious. Thus, the notion of either 'faction' is "absurd".
But let's develop this thought a bit more, and hopefully save 'the other guys' time in every sense of the word. Let's evaluate a scenario like this which hasn't yet been presented; namely, a scenario in which all this is done, personnel seek a restored Divine Will-aligned position, but still attempt to retain an affiliation with the quasi-groups. They'd then be seeking the benefits of a Divine Will-aligned position, while also seeking the benefits of affiliation with an organization which has spread in assets and influence as a result of a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature agenda. [Not to mention subversion, treason, and so on and so forth.] For example, personnel within the Holey Sea who abandon counter-Divine Will imagery and symbolism and profess to align with Divine Will, perhaps even to 'reform' the quasi-organization from here on out into something functional and Divine Will-aligned. They'd then be perpetuating an organization which only continues to exist due to all it's manifestly done on a counter-Divine Will basis, and the result would be to profit [in a limited sense of the concept] from the very opposite of rightdoing. Clearly, that wouldn't work either.
But from all appearances I'm manifestly expected to opt into a scenario of cheering on people who claim to be seeking a Divine Will- and True Nature-aligned position while they're self-evidently continuing to reject both. Such a scenario would appear to be merely attempting to sell Me hypocrisy, and that doesn't escape My notice [and instant rejection] simply because it would appear that I've found 'My kind of people' whom I could cheer on in what has to be among the most "absurd" positionality conflicts manifest, that never had a genuine reason to manifest in the first place.
It's been essentially this position that I've found the telepaths and propheciers to manifestly be in, and you'll notice My corresponding manifest rejection of them for quite the same reason. Despite their covert urging for assistance upholding Divine Will and True Nature, they've manifestly demonstrated a pattern of behavior ["absurd" though it is] in direct conflict with that basis.
So, 'both factions' in the presented scenario are no-option options. The people involved certainly have the ability to correct that, but have manifestly thus far Chosen not to. They have no genuine reason to refuse, but that fact doesn't translate into My acceptance of that current manifest refusal.
For Me to knowingly, Willfully and avoidably 'buy into' it would presumably mean 'buying into' a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position. Which would appear to be the point of the effort, inasmuch as there is any.
Meanwhile the devising and investment in presenting various counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature scenarios is nobody's True Nature and a manifest, ongoing rejection of same. There's no genuine reason for them to do so, nor do they truly desire to. It's all a bit passé, especially by now. Truth be told, there isn't even any especial need for Me to take the literal time to respond to it, but I do try to uphold duty to Divine Will and My own True Nature by making My position as clear for others as possible [knowing, Willful and avoidable ambiguity being an unacceptable lapse of standards] and hopefully use whatever scenarios I encounter as a teaching tool for others in the matter of Divine Will principles and True Nature both.