On yesterday’s ‘N█wshour’ I noticed an item that seemed, despite being on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, an implication from the apostate system restructuring their response to ‘independents’ and ‘rebels’ based on the implementation that I’d described. That would have been the normal, healthy interpretation to make of it, assuming they were responding on a natural, stable, normal basis. I was disappointed at the time, given that they were still presenting on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis of symbolism. But perhaps they now understood better and were striving to improve, and just couldn’t describe the situation on a non-overt basis without using counter-Divine Will symbolism. I gave them some grace on that.
Today’s ‘n█ws’ is full of all manner of disrespectful and grotesque imagery and symbolism. And repeated use of the “c█rnival” symbol, which is a reference ‘organized crime’ uses for ‘ecst█cy’. Which itself is used in their subset of non-overt symbolism to reference an ‘inverted’ mode of signaling, in which a symbol is always presented ‘inverted’ or the opposite of what they mean. Or rather, in which another symbol is, given that they so frequently invert regardless.
So I went back and had a listen to yesterday’s news again, and sure enough the symbolism parsed to be readable in that ‘inverted’ mode. In this version, their attempts to ‘entrap’ Me into accepting as valid some bogus ‘rebel’ group which was actually just another of ‘their’ quasi-franchises, in this case ‘organized crime’. The same ‘organized crime’ that I’d already refused to Work with because they insisted on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. The same ‘organized crime’ that was used to concoct a massive public fraud in the form of the bogus ‘rebel’ ‘h█ppie’ effort at ‘L█urel C█nyon’ which took the lives of so many innocents, including young children. So not only is this yet another ‘rerun’, given that I refuse to even Work with sell-out Asian dynastic groups which have a vastly more credible presentation, it’s unclear why anyone would think I’d Work with ‘organized crime’. Or indeed with anyone ‘knowingly, Willfully and avoidably’ Working on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis.
Which appears to be exactly the intended presentment to Me: ’Can we haggle with him to get his acceptance of a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis if we perk up the image to something more benevolent-seeming and give him a lot of seeming praise while throwing in grotesquery and disrespect here and there?’ Since replying to that verbatim would likely result in a tone well outside of My usual standards a mere, ‘Absolutely not.’ will have to suffice.
As the apostate system is manifestly in default I’d also have no sincere motive to ‘rebel’ against it regardless. It’s already Mine, and they’re manifestly retaining control over ‘stolen property’. Demonstrating that to the People doesn’t require abandoning a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis, and even if it did I’ve got My priorities right, which I’ve been clearly demonstrating for quite a while now.
So manifestly it’s more “time” wasting, unearned disrespect, offense and so on, which isn’t contributing much to their manifest rapport with Me. And I additionally protest their debased, vulgar, blasphemous and disrespectful behavior regardless of whether it’s presented with a lot of counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature symbolism and imagery; that hardly indemnifies.
‘For the record’, ‘inversion’ isn’t a legitimate mode of communication even within the quasi-legitimate subset of communication that is non-overt symbolism. And the apostate system knows it. So I find it just as non-credible that they’re ‘inverting’ on the Babylonian level with “H█ra” as I do the “c█rnival” thing on the ‘organized crime’ level, but duty requires Me to make a ‘good faith’ effort to monitor their investments and their efforts regardless of whether they’re legitimate. If they’d manifestly been legitimate from the start, none of this would have been necessary.
I’ve also noticed intimations here and there, also on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, that the apostate system has manifestly acknowledged My legitimate authority and is making the transition ‘a big seekrit!’ at first. Not only is that wholly rejectable [and indeed rejected] given that a lack of ‘honesty’ and ‘forthrightness’ certainly don’t represent My interests, but credibility on that signal is just as lacking as it is with anything else presented on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. If anyone manifestly and sincerely has accepted that apparently implied premise, I’m required by duty to let them know they manifestly err.