If I’ve read them correctly, the apostate system appears to express the specific concern that in citing l█rics and other media samples as evidence I could perhaps be using My own symbolism via media references to organize on a non-overt basis simultaneously. And that as such I’d be using non-overt symbolic organizing, on a counter-Divine Will basis, which wouldn’t be fair.
I suppose I could do that. I’m not, but establishing that to the satisfaction of someone else is a very different matter.
While they manifestly remain on a knowing, Willful and avoidable counter-Divine Will and counter-True Nature basis I have no means of ascertaining whether their apparently implied concern is sincere. Nor while they manifestly continue to Choose such a basis are their concerns particularly relevant.
It is however a matter of fairness. What’s more, others less principled than I could do precisely that. As such I’m definitely interested to find a fair resolution to the concern. I’m not certain presently what that fair resolution would involve. I know it wouldn’t involve a scenario in which the presence of counter-Divine Will symbolism was precluded entirely in all situations, as that would preclude the presentation of evidence and the ability to name offending corporations in criminal and civil trials, and thus prioritize counter-Divine Will symbolism more favorably than truth, rights and justice. Which is to say it would prioritize a counter-Divine Will basis at the expense of Divine Will, and that’s clearly a misprioritization.
I’ll give the matter some consideration. I’ll also ‘crowdsource’ suggestions from readers, specifically those who aren’t manifestly Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis knowingly, Willfully and avoidably. Though they’re not published, leaving a comment here works nicely.
Something which does immediately occur is that whether, how, when and if someone is using non-overt symbolism tends to be noticeable as a continued trend made apparent by an ongoing pattern of behavior. The implied concern is likely to be a self-correcting issue, in that as I create and share more evidence and tutelage, with the occasional media reference presented as evidence of symbolism, it should become self-evident that it’s merely that basis upon which I’m using it, and that alone.
Usage patterns are how I’ve managed to determine the apostate system’s use of them, and what enables Me to publicly expose same. Attempts to establish a usage pattern on My part should demonstrate nothing of the kind. Common sense would seem to suggest that if I’m able to expose and shut down something, I wouldn’t use the same methodology on My own part.
Having noticed that I only genuinely want things which are fair to all, a motive for such methods is certainly lacking on My part. Yes, there are things in life which I’d like, valid applications of My personal rights, which the apostate system manifestly has temporarily put out of reach with subversion of legislation, judiciary and law enforcement with the passage of certain bogus ‘victimless crime’ legislation, but I’m well aware that this was mostly to induce the People to subscribe to their unreliable non-overt ‘workarounds’ for the acquisition of those things. And that those ‘workarounds’ primarily exist as methods of blackmail to capture the complicity of the People. So despite their being legitimate personal interests on My part, I’m nevertheless eager to make the legislation, judiciary and law enforcement aspects of society integrous once again, as well as sort out the apostate system which has manifestly caused them to be in a less than worthy condition, and remade overt government into organized criminality. Thus although it appears I’ll have to continue enduring those rights violations for the nonce, they do increase the satisfaction which will come of having significantly aided the People in sorting it all out.
While we’re on the subject, I’ve noticed for a while now that many of the apostate system’s pr█pagandists on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis have been similarly naming corporations and their various abuses, either manifest or merely contrived, and seem to have been using the “br█nding” symbolism of naming corporations to clearly [in terms of non-overt symbolism, at least] indicate their Chosen counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. I acknowledge that in terms of prevalent symbolic that’s been considered a clear enough identifier, but given what I’ve demonstrated recently about symbolic grammar involving counter-Divine Will symbolism having been overzealously applied [in that it would result in encroachments against rights, truth, justice and indeed Divine Will] I suspect that it’s now known by all involved that that alone is insufficient to clearly provide a clear and fair distinction of position. Plenty of people on a legitimate basis would have just cause to seek legal action against those same corporations, and the fact that they must name and provide overt evidence against the offending entities in order to do so doesn’t affect their Divine Will alignment.
I’ll continue giving consideration as to how I could better provide a clear and distinct position that doesn’t preclude truth, justice and Divine Will by unfairly precluding evidence and culpability. I do think that any concerns on that matter will tend to resolve themselves in the absence of an ongoing pattern of behavior on My part to substantiate it though. Whatever the manifest distinctions of Chosen basis and position between Myself and the apostate system, I think everyone involved should have a fair and clear resolution on that. Certainly the People deserve it.