Re: ‘Timesharing’, ‘Recognition’

The apostate system appears to be responding to My frustration regarding the literal delay, as best they can on a non-overt, counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. Paraphrasing My best interpretation of it into plan and clear language:

’Look, we’re not trying to be unfair here. You could indeed be a legitimate superior authority on a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis, we don’t know that. We haven’t been able to ‘recognize’ that yet, so we’re throwing all kinds of non-overt scenarios at you and gauging Your responses to them. We can’t just hand over control of the apostate system to someone who’s not on a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis, that would be terrible! But to keep things sort of fair as we perform our in-house assessment process, we’re granting You sort of a ‘timeshare’ usage of our personnel. That’s why they were using both Your “house’s” symbolism and ours a while back, until you objected to that.’

It’s presented on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis which is non-credible and in which ‘good faith’ isn’t guaranteed practically by definition. It would be erroneous on My part to assume ‘good faith’ as present on a basis whose major purpose is to preclude it. But let’s evaluate it anyway so we can resolve the implied arguments there.

Divine Will alignment exists regardless of whether or not it’s recognized. Not to recognize it where it manifestly exists is to transgress against Divine Will, and that’s the kind of thing that makes an organization illegitimate. A legitimate organization literally doesn’t have the option to transgress against Divine Will without becoming manifestly, er, apostate.

I’ll provide an overt legal parallel to this concept: the literal ‘g█n control debate’ in the literal States. People don’t want something bad to happen, so they revise policy in an effort to prevent it. But that policy revision is something bad, a lesser something bad, violating rights across the land for plenty of cases in which that something bad would never have happened. Innocent folks manifestly lose their freedoms as a result. And has already been precluded by the system that attempts to implement such a policy: because that system, the government, already knows or should know that it’s not allowed to do that. When it does it anyway, the entire system becomes a criminal because of it.

Continuing the overt parallel, there already exists an appropriate solution to that kind of situation: Because you can’t legitimately prelegislate away Divinely-conferred rights, the only fair response is to wait until another party does something wrong and take action. This is why we have jury trials. The action taken is supposed to be commensurate to the wrongdoing that was done, and severe enough to deter others from doing the same thing later on.

How does that parallel apply here in our situation? It’s pretty easy. Because it would be wrong to retain control of the apostate system on a counter-Divine Will basis and ‘short’ the party who’s on an ‘unrecognized’ Divine Will and True Nature basis, the fair thing to do would be to cede control to them and see if there even is a problem with them transgressing against Divine Will principles. If that were to happen, make a clear, thoughtful, reasoned case for your concerns on a basis of Divine Will principles [which have already been provided] and present it to Me. Given that I’m on a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis, I’d hear and give either correction on the argument or on the behavior, with remedy and relief where appropriate. If I weren’t, that would demonstrate the manifest lack of a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis so vital for legitimate authority, and anyone on a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis could then depose and displace Me precisely because My authority wouldn’t be legitimate.

That would successfully address the implied concern, without having to ‘short’ anyone or have it look ‘for all the world’ like the currently recognized authorities within the apostate system are merely refusing to cede ‘their’ control on an illegitimate counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis to someone on a legitimate basis purely for reasons of personal ambition. It’s a pretty basic solution, and anything less is just wrongdoing. It’s not right to deny someone a thing that’s legitimately theirs merely on a sequence of hypotheticals. Nor is it right to deny the People a ruling system that’s solidly based in alignment with Divine Will and True Nature in favor of a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature system.

They’d implied to Me recently, ’We’re not trying to be unfair here. Why, do you think we’re being unfair?’ There? Yes, I think you manifestly are there. I’m not certain whether it’s deliberate but it certainly isn’t right, for the reasons I’ve just detailed. Perhaps the currently-recognized authority figures within the apostate system just didn’t know. It seems a little unlikely given that it’s ‘run’ by an assemblage of telepaths and propheciers manifestly Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, yet unlikely things manifestly happen all the literal time. So I’m not sure whether they were aware of it or not, let alone had the solution to that. But I can have certainty that they do now, because I’ve just given it to them.

Next, the implied argument that, ’We can’t just have our system run by someone who’s on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis, that would be terrible!’ Excuse Me, but isn’t that what you’ve manifestly had all along there? Even if it’s just the rank and file, and the currently-recognized authority figures ‘at the top’ identify as having a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned position, I’ve already shown that nobody with an actual Divine Will and True Nature-aligned position could or would condone heading an organization which benefits from accepting a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis position at the ‘lower’ levels. It’s anathemic. They’re mutually-exclusive bases. So it’s either one, or the other. The agent represents his principal, he can do no other.

[Edit: A metaphor immediately removed to preclude the likelihood of misinterpretation.] As such, anyone not on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis has superior legitimacy sufficient to displace the currently-recognized authority figures within the apostate system, because they haven't been knowingly, Willfully and avoidably Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis and as such hasn’t forfeited his legitimacy. I’m not saying that to give offense, My literal point here is only that jettisoning Divine Will and True Nature also by definition jettison legitimate authority and therefore literally anything is superior to that, because a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis is literally the worst standard that someone can have.

To clarify, I’m discussing the manifest legitimacy of position there. The Divinely conferred True Nature of the currently recognized authority figures within the apostate system is the same worthy, bright, glorious and noble thing that it’s always been. The manifest problem here is that they’ve been literally Choosing to reject it.

As for the personnel ‘timesharing’ or perhaps ‘dual citizenship’, that’s a literal ‘E for effort’. It’s also how “lyc█nthropy” starts. Precisely because a Divine Will basis and a counter-Divine Will basis are mutually-exclusive, personnel cannot legitimately be so ‘timeshared’ like that. So the apostate system either knew or should have know that such a presentment was insufficiently “cold” for Me to “touch”, because I’ve explained it here often enough. It’s a given that such a scenario wasn’t something of which I could make use, and it’s also why I was so quick to object when it claimed to represent My “house”, because the position of those personnel was manifestly antithetical to it.

In My best assessment, the notion that the apostate system has been spending the last few ‘years’ throwing a sequence of tropes at Me to assess My responses in order to ‘recognize’ My Divine Will-aligned legitimate authority doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. If that were so, there would have been no use repeating various tropes over and over again. Basically, it’s been ‘suckage’ for which those Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis now attempt to rationalize. But Divine Will principles show us that there is no valid justification for knowing, Willful and avoidable ‘suckage’. Therefore, since I can now have certainty that they know how to avoid it because I’ve just told them, I trust they’ll remedy the matter. I’d prefer to think that their “Br█xit” [counter-Divine Will ‘suckage’ combined with plenty of literal delays caused by shiftless officials, depicted as an apostate effort using their “nonsense words” symbol] merely refers to an overt strategy by the apostate system in another matter, rather than our situation here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *