And even more clarity

We’ve established that those manifestly knowingly, Willfully and avoidably Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis are effectively non-credible in their words and deeds, both overtly and non-overtly. They manifestly ‘ought not be heard’ while they manifestly insist on such a basis. Others however have been ‘hearing’ them and investing their literal time, Will, effort and material resources into counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature agendas, which is manifestly wrong and violates rights; it’s an abomination. As such, assessing the manifest investments of these quasi-organizations and exposing them is just part of doing the right thing. And it’s usually accurate, other than in scenarios like recently where they’ve been demonstrably investing in ‘fakeout’ efforts as an apparent deterrent. It’s not clear to Me how manifestly compounding their investment in a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position with another ‘conspiracy to defraud’ helps to vindicate it.

Counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature positions are unworthy of our investments into them, but as even overt history manifestly demonstrates in abundance that is precisely what the apostate system knowingly, Willfully, avoidably and quite systematically has done. As such, that’s its manifest basis for all intents and purposes. It would be so nice if they’d just Choose Divine Will and their own True Nature. If nothing else it would defy the prophecies in Revelations, but as the Old Testament has shown us other prophecies didn’t come to pass specifically because they were heeded, and the People repented. So it’s certainly there to Choose, but while they manifestly don’t what they’re manifestly on is a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis and as such, their symbolic basis manifestly quite accurately describes their Chosen position.

So yes, a counter-Divine Will basis oughtn’t be ‘heard’. And yet they systematically not only ‘hear’ of it, they manifestly continue to invest greatly in that basis. That this is something which is wrong is an element of Divine Will and our True Nature, which is the basis of My “house” and our motivation. So vigilance as to their manifest investments in wrongdoing is just part of upholding Divine Will and True Nature, and those manifest investments should never have been made. It’s good that both My “house” and the apostate system recognize that.

Because those manifestly Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis inherently aren’t on a credible, benevolent or reliable basis, I should probably expose something they’d presented which I’d already dismissed as silly a bit ago. I’d mentioned that their manifest presentation of the ‘public education’ trope was more elaborate than I’d encountered from the telepaths and propheciers. As part of setting the context for Me to find, they’d manifestly arranged some of their non-overt symbolism into a pattern of ‘roleswapping’ between My position and theirs. That is, they’d consistently make an effort to present non-overt symbolism in such a way as to additionally be readable if I swapped My manifest position with their own, via a particular form of symbolic inversion.

Because those manifestly Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis are manifestly non-credible and unreliable, I of course noticed it, and then promptly mentally dismissed it and would’ve forgotten all about it. But a large part of the apostate system’s manifest basis involves establishing arrangements between their quasi-organization and outsiders, which are beyond the ken of the outsiders’ compatriots. And sometimes that involves literal ‘blackmail’. So I thought it would just make sense to openly expose the manifest attempt Myself, just to keep the situation clear, open, ‘aboveboard’, and so as not to provide those manifestly Choosing a non-credible, unreliable basis with something on that order.

While they’re still manifestly refusing a Divine Will and True Nature-aligned basis, I should probably implement that as a matter of routine policy. Trust is commensurate with the Choice to align with and uphold Divine Will and their own True Nature, and to manifestly reject the latter is to preclude the former. This is hardly a personal judgement about them; their True Natures are of “Light” and very refreshing to encounter. It’s manifestly a pity that they haven’t been allowing that.

At any rate, while they manifestly continue rejecting Divine Will and their own True Nature, they're absolutely right: their manifest position and basis does not deserve to be heard, and their manifest investments deserve exposure and justice.  I've been providing grace and might still do so on some occasions, but generally it manifestly appears to be time to commence intensive, overt exposure and justice precisely as I'd told them I'd have to do if they manifestly Chose to continue investing in a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis.  I think waiting literal years for them to sort themselves out is quite enough, particularly given all the various investments in counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature strategies they've manifestly been Choosing instead.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *