So the apostate system’s ‘public education’ trope manifestly appears to continue. It seems to be a stock trope they’ve arranged on a non-overt basis for use by ‘their’ personnel at need; I’ve found non-overt references to it in a stockpile of their strategies, but as naming it would likely be misconstrued as a non-overt symbolic reference for My “house” it seems more constructive not to at this juncture.
Essentially, the mainstay of the trope involves them non-overtly supporting the notion that they’re actually Working for “Light”, but that they can’t make that completely, blatantly obvious because the majority of ‘their’ personnel with less than benevolent motives just wouldn’t accept them for it. [That appears to be the first of the fallacies right there; it’s everyones’ True Nature to want Divine Will, if only they understood it.] So, according to the implied narrative, they don’t make it obvious. Rather, they supposedly devise all manner of elaborate methods of seeming not to be “Lightworking” when in fact they are. [Common sense and indeed Scripture demonstrate the fallacy there; something about “Lights” and ‘bushels’.] We had overt similar ‘propaganda’ of this nature a few literal years back; some of ‘their’ personnel were hyping the idea that ‘Obama’s really a Lightworker, he’s just not making it obvious!’ [which is more or less an accurate metaphysical summary of the manifest condition of everyone who ever lived; sincerely good people, who just manifestly aren’t living on a basis in alignment with their True Nature]. The apostate system manifestly appears to have reused this sophistry when they’d established literal Freemasonry as a public relations franchise for credibility and subversion purposes. The manifest result was that broad swaths of the People, with purely benevolent motives, were successfully encouraged to not act on those motives as openly as they otherwise would have. This trend was manifestly exacerbated and increased, until we have the manifestly less than functional scenario we have now.
If I had to summarize the apparent Divine Will principles fallacy there, it would likely be ‘void for vagueness’. If someone is knowingly, Willfully and avoidably prevaricating on whether they’re doing the right thing or not, they’re not. And if I were to accept the premise, I’d be Myself buying into the same faux-duality fallacy which Divine Will and our True Nature pre-empt, and which I’ve been disproving for years. This would presumably account for the semi-recent recurrence I’d been encountering of references to “apples” from them. ‘Thank you, no, I must decline your, er, kind offer’, and it’s nobody’s True Nature to knowingly, Willfully and avoidably offer anyone a scenario like that.
It’d also seem to account for some of the recent mentions I’ve heard from them regarding ‘trust’ and “hope”. The latter appears to be a symbol used by Rome to essentially mean ‘public confidence in them’. As in the phrase, ‘Gosh, I sure hope they’re doing the right thing!’. The People deserve vastly more than to merely ‘hope’ their trust is well-placed. As an interesting bit of trivia, whenever I encounter the symbol I always tend to reinterpret it as applying to the apostate system instead. As in, ‘Having a hope of manifestly succeeding in their counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature agendas.’ That seems more appropriate and fair from over here.
Next, while they manifestly appear to be doing all that, there appears to be yet another effort they’re enacting as well. While carefully and strategically making sure not to actually, credibly state it on either an overt or a non-overt basis, they’ve repeatedly been investing in efforts which present a concept to ‘their’ rank-and-file that I or My “house” are up to all manner of untoward things against them. This appears to be public fraud and at least attempted [edit: literal] psychological conditioning. And hoo boy, let me tell you what I’m going to do about that!
I’m going to express the matter here openly and plainly, so that it can be resolved, amended, and corrected. I’ve just done this. And I’m going to calmly, politely object: Excuse Me, I don’t find that appropriate behavior nor in keeping with their True Nature, and I must object and protest. And then I’m going to give them some opportunity to amend and correct, and reassess from there.
If I had accepted their ‘public education’ faux-dualism basis, I would have likely reasoned that because their True Nature is inherently in alignment with Divine Will, despite whatever appearances they manifestly present they’re genuinely acting in ‘good faith’, sincerity and benevolence. And that would’ve been the most natural thing in the world to have every right to expect of them. But as demonstrated, that ‘good faith’, sincerity, benevolence and deserved trust are qualities of their True Nature, which they’ve manifestly been rejecting. While they manifestly reject Divine Will and their own True Nature, there are manifestly no such guarantees of those things and as such ‘good faith’ should not be presumed. In fact, that’s more or less what’s so less than functional, unworthy and unacceptable about this whole situation. The People can’t reasonably have the place managed by those on such a basis, and Divine Will seems to agree. It would be unworthy in the extreme, and a manifest rationalization for ‘suckage’ which is precluded by Divine Will.