‘Got it.’

[Also, ‘Don’t want it.’]

The apostates’ peculiar set of symbolism and implications over the previous week or so clicked into place for Me, and suddenly there was a mental context for it all. Essentially just a more elaborate, detailed version of what I’d already described, regarding using ‘public education’ to rationalize the knowing, Willful and avoidable Choice for a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis.

Which was non-credibly implied on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. And then additionally disproven, as I’d said already, by the manifest results. ‘A principal is liable for the actions of his agents’, and even the telepaths and propheciers have manifestly caused or passively enabled no shortage of manifest ‘suckage’ directly to Myself as a resultant of their knowing, Willful and avoidable Choice for a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis.

The moral here seems to be what I’ve already stated: That which is presented on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis has no guarantees of credibility, integrity or reliability. Those are qualities which derive from Divine Will and our True Nature.

That would appear to demonstrate that I can’t even give the apostates grace enough to ‘hear them out’ while they’re on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. Let it not be said that I hadn’t tried to address the matter with as much fairness and consideration towards them as possible.

Another manifest resultant of this formula appears to be a demonstration of something else I’d already been stating: That since they cannot be reliably ‘heard’ while manifestly on such a basis, neither do they manifestly have legitimacy or valid authority.

Which means they can presumably either ‘hear’ and recognize the authority which derives from a sincere alignment with Divine Will and True Nature, or I suppose knowingly, Willfully and avoidably refuse it [though, why would anyone of course] and invest themselves in a Choice to occupy a position which is both inherently invalid, and mutually-exclusive with the whole of Creation.

Which has manifestly been the scenario. While they’re manifestly Choosing to remain out of compliance with My [or indeed any] Divine Will-derived authority, it remains to Me to correct that situation either consensually or otherwise. I’ve tried consensually, and their manifest Choice for the last few years has been to invest in all manner of “st█rytelling” on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis. They still manifestly have yet to align with, uphold and affirm a position in accordance with Divine Will and their own True Nature.

My preference within the manifestly remaining options then is to address this matter not only in alignment with Divine Will, but also openly, clearly, publicly, overtly and fairly.

This gets interesting, because their recent behavior has demonstrated that whether this is addressed on an overt basis or a non-overt basis, while they’re manifestly Choosing a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature position their responses are intrinsically non-credible. So not only can they not be relied upon for non-overt interaction, approaching that overtly for the purposes of exposure and justice make ascertaining and proving exactly what, specifically, they’ve been manifestly up to can get rather interesting. [Sounds like ‘obstruction of justice’ to Me.]

But I can still manifestly establish the existence of these quasi-organizations, which will nullify the current repostes of ‘conspiracy theory!’. And I can establish which personnel, “absurdly”, self-identify with those groups. That should gain enough attention from the general public to ensure that plenty of manhours are devoted to the project.

It’s hardly an ideal manifest situation for any of us. I’d greatly prefer to make the case for Divine Will and True Nature to people, rather than use Divine Will principles to make a case against them. But the manifestly imperfect nature of the situation is not the result of My Choices, and manifest circumstances oughtn’t determine whether or not someone upholds Divine Will and their own True Nature in the Choices which are within their ability to affect.

Since I’d also rather close this on a more soothing ‘tone’, it’s a good juncture to remind those reading this that the inherent non-credibility and invalidity of whatever’s presented on a counter-Divine Will, counter-True Nature basis also necessarily means, once again, that supposed ‘agreements’ and ‘contracts’ others have made on such a basis have no validity morally, ethically, or legally. They’re apparently manifestly backed only with brute force, yet that isn’t and can’t be legitimatized by something which intrinsically lacks credibility. A set of manifest circumstances which precluded someone from Choosing to align with and uphold Divine Will would quite naturally be unconscionable.

I of course, manifestly continue to Choose to align with, affirm and uphold Divine Will and True Nature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *