Immediately after reminding ‘the other guys’ that My Divine Will-aligned and -derived authority has clearly and distinctly gainsaid their efforts towards ‘globalism’, they made sure to emphasize ‘Trump’ at the ‘United Nations’ hyping ‘America first’ and ‘national sovereignty’. I should probably clarify that I meant not only what I’ve been terming their ‘NWO 1.0’ plan [that is, overt globalization, an oppressive one-state, the so-called ‘white male patriarchy’, etc.] which had been their subverted ‘Interim World Order’ and not genuinely intended to have any sort of permanence, even by ‘the other guys’. Merely a means to an end. I meant as well what I’ve been terming their ‘NWO 2.0’ plan, which the Rockefellers had been terming, in their words, a ‘multipolar’ order since at least the literal Fifties. As usual, RedefiningGod has the goods on that. Good summaries are here and here.
Implementing that ‘multicultural’, ‘multipolar’, allegedly ‘sustainable’ order appears on their part to rely on a number of prerequisites which they appear to continue to be directing their efforts towards. Their ‘Good Guy insiders and Trump vs. the nifferous Deep State’ massive public fraud appears to continue unabated, as does the subverted literal ‘United States’ military’s ‘The Plan’ including ‘mass arrests of the cabal and banksters’, planned military tribunal ‘show trials’ for treason, umpteen ‘sealed indictments’, and so on and so forth. Alt-media personalities such as ‘Neil Keenan’, ‘Drake Kent Bailey’, and of course the former corporate financial journalist ‘Benjamin Fulford’ have been selling this stuff for years and continue to do so. In fact, this latest from Mr. Fulford propagates some telling evidence of their efforts:
‘The WDS further said it supports keeping existing royal families in place as symbols of continuity, while day-to-day management would be left to meritocracies such as the Pentagon, the Vatican, the Chinese Communist Party, the newly created future planning agency, etc. In other words, all the functional bits of the old system would be left intact and reformed in the name of continuity and a smooth transition. Live, real-time, Internet-based democracy would also be supported, the WDS proposed.’
How nice. Rome [after an image refresh for public credibility purposes of course] and various franchises of Rome and Babylon.
In the event that the modernized, techno-’democracy’ advocated sounded too credible, Mr. Fulford makes sure to mention ‘the French … Revolution’ as well, referencing a less-than-genuine political reform implemented by Jesuits and replaced with a scenario in which the People were inundated with distinctly less-than-credible information and made mere repeaters of what had already been decided for them. They then quite naturally demanded things politically in accordance with that groupthink, which their subverted government then eagerly implemented. Vastly less than a free society, and entirely unworthy of either Divine Will or the People themselves.
So yes, their ‘NWO 2.0’ strategy appears to be that of nations as franchises for Rome and Babylon, discreetly beholden to them, and subdivided into ever-more tiny, ineffectual, and ‘interdependent’ units, perhaps regulated by a few ‘international’ bodies. Such as a credibility-restored ‘United Nations’, or the ‘future planning agency’ Mr. Fulford mentions.
As such, efforts to hype ‘national sovereignty’ and ‘America first’ aren’t particularly reassuring to Me. They would instead appear to have been precisely the public image they’d manifestly intended to implement for some while now.
As for what I’d been terming the ‘NWO 3.0’, that is, the genuinely Divine Will-aligned discreet confluence of Divine Will- and True Nature-aligned and -upholding authority positions bolstering genuine ‘national sovereignty’, that appears to be manifestly unimplementable at this juncture given the counter-Divine Will basis of Rome, Babylon, and the telepaths and propheciers themselves. Even were Rome and Babylon to manifestly transition to a Divine Will- and True Nature-affirming basis at some later juncture, their manifest investments in a position mutually-exclusive with that in order to establish the clout they now manifestly have would necessarily disqualify them from legitimacy. It would be essentially like committing a crime spree in order to amass resources to later give charitably, and I’m not entirely certain that’s merely a simile.
We encounter essentially the same phenomenon in the venue of literal ecology. Rome and Babylon manifestly appeared perfectly content for ‘their’ multinational corporations to, er, affect the literal ecology profoundly in the course of their empire-building, and then to later use the results of their ecological handiwork as a public prompt to collapse the so-called ‘Interim World Order’ and take on a new appearance, abandoning the onus of their manifestly outrageous behavior in the process. In fact they also manifestly appear to be seeking to take the credit for resolving the situation in their new public identity, and gleaning the public perception of honor, duty, and integrity which accompanies that. Never mind that these organizations have already demonstrated, there and throughout manifest human history, what they’re quite willing to commit in order to establish their empire. So long as the onus never successfully applies to their organizations, it would seem, these organizations appear to have no qualms about committing them and even benefiting from them and continuing to benefit from them many times over.
Which presents rather neatly a juncture to clarify another item. Specifically, the covert intimation manifestly made by them recently on a counter-Divine Will basis, presenting to Me the notion that I might possibly be a bit too severe with them recently, and that it could just possibly be misinterpreted as a less-than-Divine Will-and-True-Nature-aligned position on My part. In fact it’s manifestly been repeatedly presented-obliquely-yet-not-quite-actually-covertly-said a number of times regarding Me recently, as if ‘presented for My consideration’ much like a similar but more reprehensible recent covert intimation which I find no need to dignify by responding to directly. And just as credible.
So I find no serious acceptance of the proffered notion on their part. But I can certainly clarify the matter for them so that both Myself and ‘the other guys’ know what’s going on.
Divine Will is of course never the problem. True Nature, deriving from it, is never the problem. People, themselves, are never truly the problem, and are intrinsically valid. But their manifest Choices, investments and positions, to the extent that they manifestly encroach against Divine Will or their own True Nature, very frequently manifestly are. And in a formula in which some align with, uphold, and assert Divine Will and True Nature, and others systematically invest themselves in positions which are mutually-exclusive with it, for each such investment manifest dissonance between those mutually-exclusive positions results. As the investment compounds, so the dissonance intensifies. At this manifest juncture it’s pretty pronounced indeed. While I have behavioral standards which preclude Me from expressing that in a number of unworthy forms, My alignment with Divine Will and My own True Nature require, as a matter of clarity and truth, that this be made quite plain. Truth requires demonstrating positions, Choices, investments and the organizations manifestly making them [even now!] which are outrageous, reprehensible, vile, unworthy, unjust, unconscionable, irreverent, odious and certainly pitiable, as well as a plethora of other things, as manifestly having those qualities. To behave as though they were somehow legitimate and respectable, as ‘the other guys’ have manifestly been doing for example, would not only be less than true, it would in a sense manifestly make Me a kind of minor accomplice to the whole thing. Divine Will, and True Nature of course, demand better than that.
So yes, another answer on My part to an item which was never genuinely a concern on theirs, merely as part of a constructive basis. A propensity for constructiveness and assistance, where it would be consistent with Divine Will and True Nature, are just a natural part of alignment with Divine Will and True Nature. As, in appropriate circumstances, is an immeasurable determination to manifest justice.
Were 'the other guys', including the telepaths and propheciers, manifestly behaving in accordance with Divine Will and their True Nature of course, we'd be finding none of this. Not only because their various strategies, intimations, attempted 'psyche-outs' and so on would be correctly acknowledged by them as unworthy and hardly respectful enough to even contemplate implementing, but also of course because this entire scenario would have manifested almost diametrically differently had they been Working on a Divine Will- and True Nature-affirming basis in the first place.