Just a few items of clarification here, and a formal protest. I'd been encountering them in drips and drabs in various places, and the recent episode of Night Vale (clearly in the 'evidence' category) appears to reference them both, indicating that investment in those agendas was apparently intentional. Whether they're sincerely-intended or not, presented as they are from anti-Divine Will positions, I can only surmise. I'm providing clarification just on the off chance they were, displacing nebulous possibilities as usual with Divine Will-aligned fact.
The first has to do with an implied uncertainty by a certain other party as to whether or not I'd now be interested in opting into 'the other guys'' counter-Divine Will position in exchange for their covertly publicizing, from said counter-Divine Will position, the Divine Will principles information I've presented. This would seem to be in parallel with 'the other guys' recent general effort to overtly and covertly push a 'reform' agenda likely to seem favorable to Me, again in exchange for My buy-in to their manifest counter-Divine Will position. Stating this very clearly here, I must continue to decline. Without Divine Will it's all just permutations on the same dysfunctional, unworthy Choice and I can't opt into that. What's more, they know this now just as the telepaths and propheciers do, and know that a counter-Divine Will position is a clear indication of the Choice for an insincere and non-credible position, given that it necessarily precludes True Nature as it does. Repatterning "absurdities" into varying shapes and forms can hardly make them any less "absurd". In honesty, at first I noticed no distinction between this apparent effort on the part of 'the other guys' because from My perspective, counter-Divine Will positions are typically the same thing regardless of the specific form and shape, and so it's been indistinguishable for all intents and purposes from the rest of their manifest approaches. That will presumably remain the case, and so the manifest Choice on their part reduces simply to an ongoing investment in the Choice to reject Divine Will and their own True Nature... which as I've shown is in direct conflict with My Will. A position of rejecting Divine Will, ones' own True Nature and the rights and Will of others is hardly a legitimate nor sincere position, and so I've just manifestly been encountering a sequence of "non sequitors" from them.
I've also been noticing vague implications by 'the other guys' to associate Me with "Jupiter", unless I've been parsing ineffectively. This would appear to be a flattering (if insincerely meant, due to the inherent rejection of their own True Nature involved here) attempt to seek accord as follows: Recognition and adherence to My Divine Will-aligned and -derived authority at the pinnacle of 'their' group - the group which by now after thousands of manifest years of counter-Divine Will agendas and efforts has rendered itself Divine Will-insolvent - if only I'll accept and permanently enjoin said group. Another implied, apparent "non sequitor" - to acknowledge My Divine Will-derived authority if only I'll manifeslty Choose to jettison and abandon it, calling positions in conflict with Divine Will acceptable to it, and opt into them Myself. This would appear to be yet another presentation of silliness, if My interpretation of their invested-in presentation is correct. And with the caveat that all counter-Divine Will positions are inherently non-credible and spurious, I would like to mention that it certainly is refreshing to encounter them taking a nicer and more hospitable position, as this is closer to their True Nature and everyones' True Nature is inherently desirable to encounter.
Which segues neatly to the other item actually. 'The other guys' -including- the telepaths and propheciers [which has been rare] have been approaching Me recently with apparent efforts to use 'their' downlow sexual recruiting mechanisms in combination with anti-Divine Will symbolism, imagery and positions as part of an apparent effort to seek My enjoinment in 'their' organizational structure and a counter-Divine Will position. This actually comes as part of a "Gemini" approach from the telepaths and propheciers, inasmuch as they provide a brief glimmer of the True Nature in others that we all find so naturally attractive and thus make faint acknowledgement and reference to their own True Nature, which of course is a constant and absolute. However the common denominator appears to be the effort by the T&P to induce Me to deem acceptable a position of rejection of that True Nature as part of an opt-in to an anti-Divine Will position. I've already addressed this yonks ago, but "contracts" don't exist under such duress - presumably the T&P devised the downlow sexual recruiting mechanism with full precongizance of how its usage would affect Me, and presumably with that as the underlying intention for doing so, whatever the sociopolitical effects of its application. So this mechanism takes what belongs to Divine Will and evidently attempts to present it as a bargainin counter to induce opt-in to a counter-Divine Will position, misusing something Divine for an "absurd" and unworthy purpose and generating a kharmic onus in the process for robbing our shared Creator of their due devotion and their fellow men of quality of life. Meanwhile, I've already shown that "contracts" are not valid in a context which jettisons conscience or Divine Will. [Unconscionable contracts are void ab initio under common law, and the very idea of justice is just formalized fairness, and Divine Will is the original source of all fairness. Thus, any venue which jettisons that souce of laws, rights, and fairness effectively couldn't care less about them, and thus has no legitimate cause for complaint when it encounters behavior which would violate them to their own disadvangate; they've already Chosen to jettison them.] And I've also presented how a literal romantic encounter with a postal worker or company employee doesn't result in a coupling with their employing organization. I'd think this would be especially so where the corporation is insolvent and continues to operate, albeit without a current and valid charter.
So these are concepts which we've examined already. Not much new here. Permutations on the manifest Choice by 'the other guys', including the telepaths and propheciers, to act in conflict with their own True Nature and with Divine Will. A Choice, we recall, that has no genuine or sincere basis for desiring in the first place... and as part of an increasingly hypothetical manifest organization relying on opt-in "contracts" which are void ab initio. Enforcing those "contracts" is much like the overt enforcement of so-called 'adhesion contracts' by police officers acting in an unconstitutional capacity: the de facto application of force under the pretense of a system of law which is in truth the "absurd" Choice to jettison the law.
Incidentally, I suppose it's My duty to provide notice and issue protest regarding yet another manifest rights violation that's been increasingly affecting Me along with others. The literal city in which I live has had an unconstitutional 'camping ordinance' on its books for quite a while now, making it effectively illegal to be literally homeless and certainly untenable to sleep at night, at least without being awoken, harassed, fined, and occasionally arrested for violating someone else's property rights [even in wilderness 'public land']. This has been problematic and a rights violation for decades, here and in other areas. Just another indirect resultant of 'the other guys' conspiring to part the People from their understanding, upholding, and prioritization of rights and laws. I mention it now because this literal city has evidently revised its 'color of law' enforcement approach, taking literal rangers and presumably police off some of the day schedules to actively search for people sleeping out in the wilds at night to cite or arrest them. Result: Not only sleeping sleeping consensually on privately-owned property nearly always used as pretext for citation / unlawful arrest, but now so is sleeping on public land - that is, land belonging to the People collectively but now increasingly claimed by the City as a private entity. This comes as budget collapses have all but closed the town's shelter to the general public. Thus far I've gotten around it by sleeping on the outer property of the shelter, but this is amidst the mentally unstable and career criminal set which brings its own set of sleep violations. Sleep is a basic part of 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' - or as we'd put it in more Divine Will-aligned symbolism, 'life, freedom and the attainment of fulfillment and quality of life' - 'the other guys' had overtly and officially guaranteed to uphold and recognize more than two centuries ago, and now routinely and systematically encroached against with plenty of accompanying societal and kharmic liability. Naturally, I must protest this rights-violating behavior. Crime is the violation of the rights of another, and so this is clearly wrongdoing or crime. It's not currently overtly correctable, as 'the other guys' have spent the last century or two actively subverting the overt courts. Now "contracts" with 'the other guys' are inherently void on an anti-Divine Will basis and I wouldn't even if I could, but I must protest formally and remind them that Divine Will precludes this sort of behavior. People are certainly precluded from acting effectively, let alone achieving meaningful quality of life, when they're deprived of sufficient literal rest.
Which just reaffirms the conclusion I reached with regard to 'the other guys' apparently seeking to proffer overt and covert 'reform' initiatives on an anti-Divine Will basis: a sarcastic retort that, 'Why yes, because this is so much better than them simply Choosing to uphold Divine Will and their own True Nature. Who'd want that, when we could have people rejecting Divine Will and encroaching against each others' dignity and quality of life?'